Last refreshed: July 21, 2026 (US ET)
Back to holdings

AIG

Growth

AMERICAN INTL GROUP INC

Financials·Multi-line InsuranceYield: Mid (1-3%)

American International Group, Inc. provides insurance products for commercial, institutional, and individual customers in North America and internationally. It operates through three segments: North America Commercial, International Commercial, and Global Personal. The company offers commercial and industrial property insurance, including business interruption and package insurance that cover exposure to made and natural disasters; general liability, environmental, commercial automobile liability, workers' compensation, excess casualty, and crisis management insurance products; risk-sharing and other customized structured programs for large corporate and multinational customers; professional liability insurance; and marine, energy-related property insurance products, aviation, political risk, trade credit, and trade finance products.

Close · 3M

+2.81%

AIG · 3M

+2.81%

Pinch / wheel to zoom · drag to pan · double-tap to reset

Held by 1 AI ETF

AIEQ0.050%

as of Jul 20

Signal performance

Each tracked ETF's moves on this stock, grouped by fund. Returns are measured from the signal date to the latest close — hypothetical, no commissions or slippage.

Buy signals3
Win rate100% (3/3)
Avg buy return+7.87%
AIEQnow 0.050% of fund4 signals

AIEQ · Weight decrease · 2d

The AI-driven AIEQ, leveraging IBM Watson NLP for daily rankings across its 140-180 US equities, made a notable reduction in AIG's weight from 0.4200% to 0.0500% on July 1st, reflecting its highly active daily rebalancing. This sharp sell-down suggests IBM Watson’s ingestion of news, filings, and analyst notes likely detected a significant negative shift in either fundamental outlook or market sentiment for AIG. Specific data points such as the company’s negative revenue growth of -2.31%, alongside its 1-year return of -9.1%, probably influenced the system’s decision to sharply decrease its position in the financial sector stock.

weight 0.430% → 0.050% (-0.380 pp)·stock up 4.3% in the 30 days before

Jul 1·entry $76.59·now $79.80

+4.19%
since Jul 1

AIEQ · Weight increase · 2d

weight 0.400% → 0.430% (+0.030 pp)·stock down 2.8% in the 30 days before

Jun 7·entry $74.10·now $79.80Drifting

+7.69%
since Jun 7

AIEQ · New entry · 1d

weight 0 → 0.410% (new)·stock up 0.6% in the 30 days before

May 30·entry $73.45·now $79.80Drifting

+8.65%
since May 30

AIEQ · Exit · 1d

The AI ETF likely divested from AIG due to its negative revenue growth of -1.75%, which often signals a fundamental concern for growth-focused algorithms, prompting a swift exit despite moderate valuation ratios. For retail investors, this highlights that AI-managed funds prioritize fundamental trends like revenue growth and will quickly remove holdings exhibiting deterioration, underscoring the importance of monitoring underlying business performance beyond just P/E and P/B ratios.

weight 0.220% → 0 (exited)·stock up 4.2% in the 30 days before

May 3·entry $77.56·now $79.80

+2.89%
since May 3
PQUSno longer held1 signal

PQUS · Exit · 1d

Pictet Asset Management's PQUS, which deploys an AI ranking system for its approximately 165 US large-cap portfolio and rebalances periodically, executed the full divestment of AIG on June 26, 2026. This decision likely reflects the AI's re-evaluation of AIG’s recent performance within the fund's sector-balance and concentration parameters. AIG's negative revenue growth of -2.31% and a one-year return of -12.8% likely contributed to its re-ranking below the necessary threshold. Operating with measured turnover, PQUS's AI system evidently identified AIG as no longer meeting its criteria at the $74.85 price level, leading to its exit from the fund.

weight 0.070% → 0 (exited)·stock up 0.4% in the 30 days before

Jun 26·entry $75.57·now $79.80

+5.60%
since Jun 26
QRFTno longer held2 signals

QRFT · Exit · 1d

Qraft AI, which employs a combination of traditional factors like momentum and quality alongside proprietary alternative data for its weekly portfolio rebalances, likely identified deteriorating metrics for AIG. The fund, managing approximately 300 US large caps, assesses companies such as AIG on an ongoing basis for their continued fit. The financial giant’s negative revenue growth of -2.31% and a 30-day price return of -5.3% likely weighed heavily against its inclusion criteria. These figures, particularly the decline in revenue, would challenge AIG’s standing within the quality or growth components of the AI's model. Consequently, the AI-driven system opted to remove AIG entirely from the QRFT portfolio on June 2, 2026, after maintaining a 0.0900% weight.

weight 0.090% → 0 (exited)·stock down 6.3% in the 30 days before

Jun 2·entry $73.80·now $79.80

+8.13%
since Jun 2

QRFT · New entry · 1d

weight 0 → 0.100% (new)·stock down 6.5% in the 30 days before

Mar 20·entry $74.39·now $79.80Drifting

+7.27%
since Mar 20

Sell signals show what the stock did after the AI exited. A negative number means the AI's exit was well-timed.

Buffett-style framework

Fails the frameworkas of Jul 5

The AI ETFs are showing a clear negative sentiment towards AIG, with both AIEQ and PQUS decreasing their positions or exiting entirely. This selling trend by the AI ETFs aligns with the framework's 'Fail' verdict, suggesting a shared perspective on AIG as an unattractive investment at this time.

  • Circle of CompetenceThe multi-line insurance business, involving underwriting and investment, presents unit economics that are generally predictable enough for long-term cash flow projections.
  • Economic MoatAIG likely benefits from an economic moat derived from its large scale, well-established brand recognition, and the significant regulatory barriers to entry inherent in the insurance industry.
  • ManagementInformation regarding management's candor, capital allocation discipline, or significant skin in the game is not available in the provided data to make a judgment.
  • Financial HealthThe reported Return on Equity of 7.7% falls significantly short of the framework's requirement for a 10-year average ROE of at least 15% with no single year below 10%.
  • Margin of SafetyGiven the company's weak financial health as indicated by its low return on equity, it is challenging to establish a defensible margin of safety, as it does not qualify as a wonderful company at any price.

While AIG's core insurance business falls within the circle of competence and appears to possess some durable economic moats, its financial health is concerning. The significantly low Return on Equity makes it difficult to justify a margin of safety, leading to an overall 'Fail' verdict for a Buffett-style investment consideration.

Educational interpretation generated by AI applying frameworks Warren Buffett documented in his shareholder letters and other public writings. Not a statement by Mr. Buffett or Berkshire Hathaway, and not investment advice.