QRFT0.160%
as of Jul 8
EOG
DefensiveEOG RESOURCES
EOG Resources, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, explores for, develops, produces, and markets crude oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas in producing basins in the United States, the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, and internationally. The company also offers crude oil and condensate, and gathering, processing and marketing. The company was formerly known as Enron Oil & Gas Company.
Close · 3M
+7.15%
Held by 2 AI ETFs
LQAI0.140%
as of Jul 17
Signal performance
Each tracked ETF's moves on this stock, grouped by fund. Returns are measured from the signal date to the latest close — hypothetical, no commissions or slippage.
Buy signals3
Win rate67% (2/3)
Avg buy return+2.09%
QRFT · Weight increase · 2d
weight 0.150% → 0.170% (+0.020 pp)·stock down 0.1% in the 30 days before
Jun 3·entry $141.50·now $141.09Fresh
-0.29%
since Jun 3
QRFT · Weight decrease · 2d
The AI-managed ETF likely began consecutively decreasing EOG's weight due to its negative revenue growth, indicating concern over the company's future top-line performance despite reasonable valuation and ROE. This action suggests retail investors should pay close attention to revenue growth trends, as even strong profitability metrics may not prevent sophisticated algorithms from de-risking positions when growth falters.
weight 0.170% → 0.150% (-0.020 pp)·stock down 5.9% in the 30 days before
May 7·entry $130.89·now $141.09
+7.79%
since May 7
QRFT · Weight decrease · 2d
weight 0.190% → 0.170% (-0.020 pp)·stock up 6.8% in the 30 days before
Apr 9·entry $136.58·now $141.09
+3.30%
since Apr 9
QRFT · New entry · 1d
weight 0 → 0.180% (new)·stock up 12.0% in the 30 days before
Mar 20·entry $138.73·now $141.09Fresh
+1.70%
since Mar 20
LQAI · New entry · 1d
weight 0 → 0.140% (new)·stock down 4.5% in the 30 days before
Jul 7·entry $134.54·now $141.09Drifting
+4.87%
since Jul 7
AIEQ · Exit · 1d
The AI ETF likely divested from EOG due to its negative revenue growth of -4.29%, which, despite a solid ROE, signaled a concerning fundamental weakening to the algorithm. This top-line decline likely indicated an unfavorable business trend or increasing sector headwinds. For retail investors, this illustrates the importance of closely monitoring revenue trends; declining sales can be an early warning of future underperformance, even when other profitability metrics temporarily appear healthy.
weight 0.210% → 0 (exited)·stock down 1.0% in the 30 days before
May 3·entry $141.61·now $141.09
-0.37%
since May 3
Sell signals show what the stock did after the AI exited. A negative number means the AI's exit was well-timed.
Buffett-style framework
Too hard to callas of May 4
AIEQ recently exited its position in EOG Resources, a move that aligns with this framework's 'Too Hard' verdict, which suggests the business is too unpredictable for long-term analysis. While QRFT maintains a small holding, the framework indicates that commodity producers present significant challenges for reliably projecting future cash flows. The AI's exit signal appears to reflect a similar caution regarding the inherent volatility of the energy sector.
- Circle of CompetenceEOG Resources operates in the highly cyclical and commodity-price-sensitive upstream oil and gas industry, making ten-year cash flow projections inherently unpredictable.
- Economic MoatThis stage cannot be assessed because the company falls outside the framework's circle of competence for predictable cash flows.
- ManagementThis stage cannot be assessed because the company falls outside the framework's circle of competence for predictable cash flows.
- Financial HealthThis stage cannot be assessed because the company falls outside the framework's circle of competence for predictable cash flows.
- Margin of SafetyThis stage cannot be assessed because the company falls outside the framework's circle of competence for predictable cash flows.
EOG Resources is deemed 'Too Hard' to analyze within this value-investing framework, as its unit economics are primarily driven by volatile commodity prices, making ten-year cash flow projections unreliable. The framework requires businesses with predictable earning power to proceed with further analysis on moats, management, financials, and margin of safety. Therefore, the analysis halts at the first stage, indicating the company lies outside the desirable circle of competence for this investment style.
Educational interpretation generated by AI applying frameworks Warren Buffett documented in his shareholder letters and other public writings. Not a statement by Mr. Buffett or Berkshire Hathaway, and not investment advice.