as of Jul 17
EQT
DefensiveEQT CORP
EQT Corporation engages in the exploration, production, gathering, and transmission of hydrocarbons and natural gas. The company sells natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil to marketers, utilities, and industrial customers located in the Appalachian Basin. It also provides marketing services and contractual pipeline capacity management services, as well as engages in risk management and hedging activities.
Close · 3M
-20.14%
Held by 1 AI ETF
Signal performance
Each tracked ETF's moves on this stock, grouped by fund. Returns are measured from the signal date to the latest close — hypothetical, no commissions or slippage.
LQAI · Weight increase · 2d
EQT currently trades at $49.56, positioning it near the lower bound of its 52-week range and following recent declines including a -10.2% 30-day return. Against this backdrop of a depressed price, the LG-Qraft collaboration's LQAI fund began incrementally increasing its position in the energy company, evidenced by the consecutive weight rises from July 14th through July 17th. The Qraft AI engine, tasked with selecting US large caps without heavy factor tilts for this core portfolio, appears to have identified EQT as a compelling opportunity. Despite recent price weakness, EQT's financial profile presents a PER of 9.44 and PBR of 1.41, alongside a 50.77% revenue growth and 14.06% ROE, suggesting the AI's rebalancing algorithm may be prioritizing underlying value and growth potential amidst a valuation dip.
weight 1.510% → 1.550% (+0.040 pp)·stock down 6.5% in the 30 days before
Jul 17·entry $49.56·now $49.05Fresh
LQAI · Weight decrease · 3d
The Qraft AI system, managing LQAI, initiated a position in EQT on July 7th, likely identifying an opportunity in the energy company's robust 50.77% revenue growth and its current price of $48.85, which sits precisely at the bottom of its 52-week range. This initial allocation aligned with LQAI's core large-cap mandate, as the stock traded 72% below its 52-week high with a favorable PER of 9.24. However, the subsequent gradual reduction in EQT’s weight, from 1.5900% to 1.4700% over the following three days, reflects LQAI’s balanced strategy, which applies AI-driven name selection without a heavy factor tilt. This consistent daily trimming indicates a tactical de-risking or ongoing re-evaluation by the AI, managing its exposure to a stock at multi-month lows rather than aggressively scaling into the position, aligning with its dynamic approach situated between broad and concentrated momentum styles.
weight 1.590% → 1.470% (-0.120 pp)·stock down 11.6% in the 30 days before
Jul 10·entry $48.85·now $49.05
LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d
The weight history for EQT in LQAI reveals a swift entry into the portfolio at 1.59% on July 7th, followed by small, consecutive daily reductions to 1.52% by July 9th. This initial allocation likely stemmed from Qraft's AI ranking engine identifying attractive factors, such as EQT's 50.77% revenue growth and a PER of 9.24, making it a candidate for the core large-cap universe despite its price residing at $48.85, the bottom of its 52-week range and after a -18.3% 30-day return. LQAI’s weekly rebalancing and AI-driven methodology mean that even with these positive metrics, the subsequent slight daily decreases reflect continuous, subtle adjustments by the Qraft engine, which monitors market conditions and potentially moderates exposure to companies experiencing sustained short-term price pressure, like EQT’s recent declines.
weight 1.590% → 1.520% (-0.070 pp)·stock down 8.7% in the 30 days before
Jul 9·entry $50.15·now $49.05
LQAI · New entry · 1d
EQT's financial metrics, including a price-to-earnings ratio of 10.0, a price-to-book of 1.41, and significant revenue growth of 50.77%, align with LQAI's core large-cap, AI-driven methodology that prioritizes a balance of valuation and growth without extreme factor tilts. The 14.06% return on equity further contributes to a quality profile suitable for this fund's balanced selection. This new entry into LQAI's portfolio occurred on July 7, 2026, when EQT was priced at $51.84, near the lower end of its 52-week range of $49.19 to $67.93 and following a -7.4% 30-day return. The Qraft AI ranking engine likely identified EQT as a compelling buy at this price point, considering its valuation and growth characteristics relative to the recent price depreciation, fitting LQAI's position between broad and concentrated momentum styles.
weight 0 → 1.590% (new)·stock down 6.2% in the 30 days before
Jul 7·entry $51.76·now $49.05Fresh
LQAI · Exit · 1d
EQT Corporation, exhibiting a PER of 10.44 and PBR of 1.41, coupled with 50.77% revenue growth and 14.06% ROE, initially presented a profile suitable for LQAI's core large-cap AI-driven selection, a strategy that balances broad market exposure with some momentum without heavy factor tilts. However, the Qraft AI engine initiated its removal from the portfolio on 2026-06-09 after a period of significant market underperformance. This timing corresponds with EQT’s -11.3% 30-day return and its current price of $52.69, sitting at 78% of its 52-week high. The weekly rebalancing mechanism of LQAI, continuously evaluating US large-cap names, likely de-ranked EQT based on this sustained negative price action, signaling a shift in its attractiveness for the fund's specific AI-driven criteria.
weight 0.200% → 0 (exited)·stock down 5.8% in the 30 days before
Jun 9·entry $52.69·now $49.05
LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d
EQT's current valuation, with a PER of 11.02 and PBR of 1.41, alongside a 50.77% revenue growth and 14.06% ROE, indicates a blend of value and growth characteristics that LG-Qraft's AI might find initially suitable for its core large-cap selection. However, the Qraft AI engine's methodology, positioning LQAI midway between broad and concentrated momentum strategies without heavy factor tilts, involves a continuous re-evaluation of relative attractiveness within its 100-stock US large-cap universe. The consecutive weight decrease in LQAI for EQT on May 20th and 21st, following a prior peak on May 19th, suggests the AI detected a shift in its relative appeal. This adjustment occurred while EQT was priced at $57.92, approximately 85% of its 52-week high, and after recording a modest +0.4% 30-day return, potentially signaling to the AI a decreased short-term momentum or a re-assessment of its valuation compared to other eligible large-cap holdings.
weight 0.240% → 0.220% (-0.020 pp)·stock down 1.7% in the 30 days before
May 21·entry $57.74·now $49.05
LQAI · Weight increase · 2d
LQAI, which applies Qraft's AI ranking to a US large-cap core universe and rebalances its portfolio of approximately 100 names weekly, has progressively increased its allocation to EQT, starting from 0.0000% on May 8th and reaching 0.2400% by May 19th. This consistent accumulation suggests Qraft's AI identifies compelling factors within the company, perhaps noting the company's 50.77% revenue growth. Despite a slight 30-day return of -0.7%, the AI's assessment likely favors EQT at its current $59.77 price, which sits at 88% of its 52-week high after a significant 90-day gain of +17.0%. The sustained, incremental additions indicate a continuous positive signal from the Qraft AI model regarding EQT's fundamental strength and value proposition within the core large-cap segment.
weight 0.220% → 0.240% (+0.020 pp)·stock up 4.9% in the 30 days before
May 19·entry $59.77·now $49.05Fresh
LQAI · New entry · 1d
The AI likely initiated a position in EQT due to its exceptional 50.77% revenue growth, indicating strong operational momentum. This growth is complemented by healthy financials including a 14.06% ROE and attractive valuation metrics like a PER of 10.65 and PBR of 1.41. For retail investors, this suggests that AI funds often target fundamentally strong companies demonstrating clear growth at a reasonable valuation. It's a reminder to balance potential growth with current pricing, rather than solely pursuing overvalued or speculative assets.
weight 0 → 0.220% (new)·stock down 3.3% in the 30 days before
May 12·entry $55.78·now $49.05Fresh
QRFT · Exit · 1d
EQT's PER of 10.44 and PBR of 1.41, coupled with its 50.77% revenue growth and 14.06% ROE, initially positioned it favorably for Qraft AI's blend of value, momentum, and quality factors within QRFT. However, leading up to its removal on June 2, 2026, the stock experienced a -4.0% 30-day return, signaling a shift in its short-term price dynamics. This downward momentum, occurring while the stock traded at $54.68, likely caused Qraft's proprietary alternative-data overlays or low-volatility screens to reassess EQT. Consequently, the AI systematically reduced its weight from 0.08% to 0.00%, indicating that its current factor profile no longer aligned with QRFT's broad large-cap core style.
weight 0.070% → 0 (exited)·stock down 6.8% in the 30 days before
Jun 2·entry $54.68·now $49.05
QRFT · New entry · 1d
The AI ETF likely initiated a position in EQT due to its strong financial profile, highlighted by exceptional revenue growth of 50.77% and a solid ROE of 14.06%, which are attractively priced given its reasonable PER of 11.18 and PBR of 1.41. For a retail investor, this suggests that AI-driven funds often seek a compelling blend of strong growth and value, rather than just one aspect. Therefore, consider companies exhibiting high growth rates and good profitability that are not excessively valued, using metrics like PER, PBR, and ROE in tandem.
weight 0 → 0.080% (new)·stock down 1.0% in the 30 days before
May 4·entry $59.08·now $49.05Fresh
AIEQ · Exit · 1d
AIEQ's daily rebalancing and its core methodology of using IBM Watson NLP to analyze market sentiment and fundamentals directly informed EQT's rapid divestment. Processing thousands of US equities, the AI model likely detected a significant negative signal or shift in EQT's outlook, precipitating its full removal from the fund's 140-180 stock portfolio. The energy company's recent 30-day return of -6.1% at the time of the exit likely weighed into the sentiment calculations that EquBot's risk overlay converted into positions. This decisive move illustrates the fund's dynamic approach to portfolio management, quickly acting on updated data insights.
weight 1.040% → 0 (exited)·stock down 7.1% in the 30 days before
May 30·entry $55.26·now $49.05
AIEQ · Weight decrease · 2d
EQT Corporation presents a PER of 10.41, PBR of 1.41, and a 50.77% revenue growth, alongside a 14.06% return on equity, metrics that align with AIEQ's broad market, fundamentals-driven selection style. However, AIEQ's manager, Amplify ETFs (EquBot), leverages IBM Watson NLP to process thousands of data points daily, including news, filings, and social posts, which likely identified a shift in market sentiment or updated fundamental signals for EQT. This led to a consecutive weight decrease from 1.1000% on May 26th to 1.0600% on May 27th, and further to 1.0400% on May 28th, 2026. This repositioning occurred as EQT's stock, trading at $55.35 and 81% of its 52-week high, registered a -5.2% 30-day return, indicating that Watson's daily ranking prompted EquBot's risk overlay to swiftly adjust exposure in line with AIEQ's high-turnover, daily rebalancing methodology.
weight 1.100% → 1.040% (-0.060 pp)·stock down 6.8% in the 30 days before
May 28·entry $55.35·now $49.05
AIEQ · Weight increase · 2d
AIEQ’s strategy, relying on IBM Watson NLP ingesting vast data from thousands of US equities, prompted a consecutive weight increase in EQT from May 17 to May 20. This sustained allocation reflects the system's daily ranking output, which EquBot's risk overlay then converts into positions within its actively managed 140-180 stock portfolio. The fund's method likely identified EQT's compelling Revenue Growth of 50.77% as a significant positive signal, driving this uptick. Despite the stock's recent 30-day return of -2.8%, its current price of $57.83 suggests the AI found sufficient upside potential to justify the increased exposure.
weight 1.080% → 1.160% (+0.080 pp)·stock up 1.5% in the 30 days before
May 20·entry $57.83·now $49.05Fresh
AIEQ · Weight increase · 2d
The AIEQ fund’s portfolio adjustments for EQT reveal a gradual daily weight increase, moving from 1.06% to 1.08% over the recent period after a preceding decline. This calibrated uplift, occurring as EQT’s price reached $56.22 after a -6.9% 30-day return, indicates AIEQ’s IBM Watson NLP likely detected improving sentiment or fundamental catalysts during the stock's dip. Given EQT's 50.77% revenue growth, a 10.71 PER, and 14.06% ROE, the AI system’s daily rebalancing mechanism appears to be capturing positive market signals or overlooked value, prompting these incremental position additions. This dynamic adjustment is characteristic of AIEQ’s high-turnover strategy, which continuously integrates new information from various sources to capitalize on shifts in market perception for companies exhibiting solid financial metrics like EQT.
weight 1.060% → 1.080% (+0.020 pp)·stock down 3.7% in the 30 days before
May 17·entry $57.45·now $49.05Fresh
AIEQ · Weight decrease · 4d
The AI ETF likely initiated the consecutive weight decrease in EQT due to its predictive models signaling a potential downturn in the energy sector or specific future underperformance for EQT, despite strong historical revenue growth. This pattern advises retail investors to consider forward-looking market and commodity price trends, rather than solely relying on recent strong financial results, when evaluating cyclical stocks like EQT.
weight 1.160% → 1.070% (-0.090 pp)·stock down 5.9% in the 30 days before
May 10·entry $56.45·now $49.05
AIEQ · Weight decrease · 3d
The AI ETF is likely reducing its EQT position, possibly taking profits after a recent upswing or reacting to a near-term shift in market sentiment or commodity price outlook for the energy sector. This suggests the AI prioritizes tactical risk management and short-term market dynamics over EQT's otherwise strong fundamental growth and profitability. For retail investors, this highlights the need to investigate recent price action, sector-specific news, and potential technical signals beyond just core financial metrics when evaluating AI-driven portfolio adjustments.
weight 1.160% → 1.080% (-0.080 pp)·stock down 5.9% in the 30 days before
May 8·entry $55.96·now $49.05
AIEQ · Weight decrease · 2d
The AI ETF's consecutive weight decrease in EQT likely reflects short-term tactical signals, such as decelerating price momentum or profit-taking after the earlier significant increase, rather than a deterioration of the company's reported strong fundamentals. For retail investors, this pattern highlights that AI funds make dynamic, often short-term, allocation decisions based on real-time data, suggesting a review of EQT’s immediate market trends or considering portfolio rebalancing.
weight 1.160% → 1.100% (-0.060 pp)·stock down 6.6% in the 30 days before
May 7·entry $56.22·now $49.05
AIEQ · Sudden change · 1d
The AI likely executed this sudden, large weight increase for EQT due to its robust revenue growth and healthy ROE, which, combined with a relatively low PER, suggests the stock was identified as an undervalued growth opportunity in the energy sector. This swift adjustment highlights the AI's capability to rapidly capitalize on shifts in perceived fundamental value or market sentiment. For retail investors, this underscores the importance of thoroughly analyzing a company's underlying financial strength and valuation metrics rather than solely relying on historical price performance.
weight 0.580% → 1.150% (+0.570 pp)·stock down 4.0% in the 30 days before
May 3·entry $59.08·now $49.05
Sell signals show what the stock did after the AI exited. A negative number means the AI's exit was well-timed.
Buffett-style framework
The AI ETFs show mixed signals regarding EQT, with AIEQ trending towards decreasing its weight after a significant entry, while QRFT has made a new, small entry. This activity contrasts sharply with a Buffett-style framework's verdict of 'Too Hard,' which would decline investment due to the inherent unpredictability of commodity-driven earnings.
- Circle of CompetenceAs a natural gas producer, EQT's earnings are highly sensitive to volatile commodity prices, making ten-year cash flow projections inherently unpredictable beyond a few years.
- Economic MoatThis stage is not assessed because the company falls outside the circle of competence.
- ManagementThis stage is not assessed because the company falls outside the circle of competence.
- Financial HealthThis stage is not assessed because the company falls outside the circle of competence.
- Margin of SafetyThis stage is not assessed because the company falls outside the circle of competence.
EQT Corporation, as a natural gas producer, operates in an industry where unit economics are fundamentally exposed to unpredictable commodity price swings. This volatility prevents the reasonable projection of ten-year cash flows, causing the company to fall outside the framework's circle of competence. Consequently, the business is deemed 'Too Hard' to analyze effectively, bypassing further evaluation of its moat, management, financial health, or margin of safety.
Educational interpretation generated by AI applying frameworks Warren Buffett documented in his shareholder letters and other public writings. Not a statement by Mr. Buffett or Berkshire Hathaway, and not investment advice.