as of Oct 23
EXPE
GrowthEXPEDIA GROUP, INC.
Expedia Group, Inc. operates as an online travel company in the United States and internationally. The company operates through B2C, B2B, and trivago segments. The B2C segment includes Brand Expedia, a full-service online travel brand offers various travel products and services; Hotels.com for lodging accommodations; Vrbo, an online marketplace for the alternative accommodations; and Orbitz, Travelocity, ebookers, and Wotif Group.
Close · 3M
+30.51%
Held by 2 AI ETFs
as of Oct 23
Signal performance
Each tracked ETF's moves on this stock, grouped by fund. Returns are measured from the signal date to the latest close — hypothetical, no commissions or slippage.
AIUP · New entry · 1d
weight 0 → 4.110% (new)·stock up 0.4% in the 30 days before
Oct 23·entry $289.01·now $283.97Fresh
AMOM · Exit · 1d
weight 0.930% → 0 (exited)·stock up 9.4% in the 30 days before
May 4·entry $246.50·now $283.97
AMOM · Weight increase · 2d
weight 0.910% → 0.950% (+0.040 pp)·stock up 10.6% in the 30 days before
Apr 29·entry $250.57·now $283.97Chased
AMOM · Weight decrease · 4d
weight 1.050% → 0.910% (-0.140 pp)·stock up 5.3% in the 30 days before
Apr 27·entry $245.22·now $283.97
AMOM · Weight decrease · 3d
weight 1.050% → 0.940% (-0.110 pp)·stock up 6.4% in the 30 days before
Apr 24·entry $251.44·now $283.97
AMOM · Accumulation · 5d
weight 0.910% → 0.950% (+0.040 pp)·stock up 5.6% in the 30 days before
Apr 23·entry $250.37·now $283.97Chased
AMOM · Accumulation · 5d
weight 0.920% → 1.010% (+0.090 pp)·stock up 11.8% in the 30 days before
Apr 22·entry $264.60·now $283.97Drifting
AMOM · Accumulation · 5d
weight 0.960% → 1.050% (+0.090 pp)·stock up 16.4% in the 30 days before
Apr 21·entry $273.80·now $283.97Drifting
AMOM · Accumulation · 5d
weight 0.950% → 1.040% (+0.090 pp)·stock up 14.1% in the 30 days before
Apr 20·entry $273.24·now $283.97Drifting
AMOM · Weight increase · 3d
weight 0.910% → 1.010% (+0.100 pp)·stock up 10.7% in the 30 days before
Apr 17·entry $265.84·now $283.97Drifting
AMOM · Weight increase · 2d
weight 0.910% → 0.960% (+0.050 pp)·stock up 5.5% in the 30 days before
Apr 16·entry $254.43·now $283.97Chased
AMOM · Weight decrease · 2d
weight 0.960% → 0.910% (-0.050 pp)·stock down 1.0% in the 30 days before
Apr 10·entry $228.09·now $283.97
AMOM · Weight increase · 2d
weight 0 → 0.980% (new)·stock down 8.9% in the 30 days before
Apr 6·entry $229.04·now $283.97Chased
AMOM · New entry · 1d
weight 0 → 0.970% (new)·stock up 1.6% in the 30 days before
Apr 2·entry $225.30·now $283.97Chased
Sell signals show what the stock did after the AI exited. A negative number means the AI's exit was well-timed.
Buffett-style framework
AIUP opened a new 4.11% position on 2026-10-23, and PQUS has been nudging its small 0.21% weight higher, so the AI ETFs are entering and accumulating. That conflicts with a Buffett-style Fail, because the AIs seem to be rewarding the cheap multiples and growth while the framework puts more weight on moat durability and a consistent return record. QRFT's tiny 0.07% stake is too small to signal conviction either way.
- Circle of CompetenceOnline travel booking has understandable unit economics built on take rates, booking volumes and marketing spend, and the business is recovering to steady growth, though it is exposed to travel cycles and to AI-driven shifts in how travelers search.
- Economic MoatExpedia has scale and a large supplier network, but it relies heavily on paid traffic from Google, faces direct booking by hotels and competition from Booking Holdings and Airbnb, and may be disrupted by AI search agents, so its network advantage looks narrower and less durable than a true moat.
- ManagementBuybacks have been sizable and capital allocation has been reasonable since the pandemic, but the data provided cannot show candor or insider ownership, and a history of leadership turnover and a complicated governance setup leave this unresolved.
- Financial HealthThe 184.84% ROE is inflated by a tiny equity base after pandemic losses and buybacks (PBR of 27), the 10-year ROE record includes years well below 10% including losses in 2020, and margins have been volatile, so the stage fails the consistency test despite healthy current owner earnings.
- Margin of SafetyA PER of 17 and EV/EBITDA of 7.5 look modest for a company growing revenue 12%, but without a conservative intrinsic value estimate and given the cyclicality of earnings, a clear margin of safety cannot be confirmed.
Expedia is an understandable business at a reasonable-looking price, but the moat is questionable because of its dependence on paid traffic and its competition. The long-run return on equity record is also inconsistent, and the current ROE is a product of leverage and a shrunken equity base rather than durable economics. On this framework it fails, even though the valuation is not demanding.
Educational interpretation generated by AI applying frameworks Warren Buffett documented in his shareholder letters and other public writings. Not a statement by Mr. Buffett or Berkshire Hathaway, and not investment advice.