GM

LQAI · Exit · 1d

GM's allocation within LQAI remained stable at approximately 0.36-0.37% for several sessions before its complete removal on July 7th, indicating a sharp shift in the AI's assessment rather than a gradual divestment. The Qraft AI engine, governing this core large-cap, weekly rebalancing portfolio, likely reassessed GM amidst its universe of approximately 100 US large caps. While GM posted a substantial 1-year return of +55.2%, its recent 30-day and 90-day returns were negative at -3.5% and -5.9% respectively, with the stock near 88% of its 52-week high. This price deceleration from an elevated level, coupled with negative revenue growth of -2.03% and a 3.96% ROE against a PER of 26.83, likely prompted Qraft's AI ranking model to de-prioritize the automaker, leading to its full exit from the portfolio during a scheduled rebalance.

weight 0.370% → 0 (exited)·stock down 8.6% in the 30 days before

Jul 7·entry $76.03·now $75.80

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

The LG-Qraft collaboration’s LQAI fund, employing Qraft AI ranking across its approximately 100 US large-cap core holdings, registered a consecutive weight decrease for GM through multiple weekly rebalances. This pattern suggests the AI’s methodology detected a mismatch between the stock's market valuation and its fundamental performance. For instance, while GM currently trades at 92% of its 52-week high, its recent revenue growth was negative at -2.03%. The sustained downward adjustment to 0.37% indicates the AI is recalibrating GM’s position within its core large-cap universe, possibly factoring in the company's PER of 28.17 alongside its modest ROE of 3.96%.

weight 0.390% → 0.370% (-0.020 pp)·stock up 9.2% in the 30 days before

Jun 18·entry $79.29·now $75.80

AIEQ · Exit · 1d

GM's financial profile, showing a negative revenue growth of -2.03% and a low return on equity of 3.96%, presents a challenging fundamental picture for the AI-managed AIEQ, despite its PBR of 1.24. With a P/E ratio of 29.57, these underlying financial weaknesses were likely flagged by IBM Watson's daily ranking process, which informs AIEQ's "fundamentals + sentiment hybrid" style. The daily rebalancing fund then removed GM from its portfolio on 2026-05-30. This decision occurred while GM was trading near its 52-week high of $86.38, having accumulated a one-year return of +65.3%, indicating the AI’s risk overlay likely assessed an unfavorable risk-reward balance given the prior price ascent against its fundamental condition.

weight 0.050% → 0 (exited)·stock up 8.6% in the 30 days before

May 30·entry $82.68·now $75.80

PQUS · Exit · 1d

The weight-change pattern for GM in PQUS reveals a consistent 0.1800% allocation maintained for a week, culminating in a sudden and complete removal to 0.0000% on May 29, 2026. This stepped divestment is consistent with Pictet Asset Management's strategy for PQUS, which employs an AI ranking system for its US large-cap universe and rebalances periodically, rather than daily, embracing measured turnover. With GM's price at $84.35, hovering at 98% of its 52-week high after a 70.0% return over the past year, the AI likely recalibrated its ranking against the company’s current financial figures. GM's PER of 29.97, coupled with negative revenue growth of -2.03% and a low ROE of 3.96%, could have prompted its removal during a periodic portfolio review, suggesting the AI found more compelling opportunities or determined GM no longer met its inclusion criteria within the fund’s sector-balanced framework.

weight 0.180% → 0 (exited)·stock up 8.6% in the 30 days before

May 29·entry $83.24·now $75.80

AMOM · Exit · 1d

The AI ETF likely removed GM due to its deteriorating financial fundamentals, specifically the negative revenue growth and very low return on equity, which made its relatively high P/E ratio appear unsustainable. The systematic reduction in weight indicates the AI identified these poor performance metrics as inconsistent with its investment criteria. A practical takeaway for retail investors is to prioritize companies with healthy revenue growth and strong profitability, avoiding stocks with high valuations that aren't supported by fundamental performance.

weight 1.260% → 0 (exited)·stock up 4.4% in the 30 days before

May 4·entry $75.70·now $75.80

AMOM · Weight decrease · 3d

The AI ETF likely reduced GM's weight due to concerning financial metrics, specifically negative revenue growth and a very low return on equity, suggesting the stock is overvalued given its poor fundamental performance. For retail investors, this serves as a strong signal to re-examine their investment in GM, as the AI's systematic selling points to a deteriorating outlook based on quantitative factors.

weight 1.350% → 1.260% (-0.090 pp)·stock up 1.0% in the 30 days before

May 1·entry $75.77·now $75.80

AMOM · Weight decrease · 2d

The AI ETF likely reduced GM's weight due to its negative revenue growth and low return on equity, signaling the model identified underperformance or declining profitability within its sector. Retail investors should use such AI-driven trends as a prompt to thoroughly review a company's fundamentals, prioritizing stocks with robust revenue growth and efficient capital utilization to avoid holding underperforming assets.

weight 1.350% → 1.290% (-0.060 pp)·stock up 3.2% in the 30 days before

Apr 30·entry $76.89·now $75.80

AMOM · Weight decrease · 3d

weight 1.390% → 1.350% (-0.040 pp)·stock up 4.3% in the 30 days before

Apr 22·entry $79.00·now $75.80

AMOM · Weight decrease · 2d

weight 1.390% → 1.370% (-0.020 pp)·stock up 8.6% in the 30 days before

Apr 21·entry $79.05·now $75.80

AMOM · Weight decrease · 3d

weight 1.400% → 1.360% (-0.040 pp)·stock up 6.6% in the 30 days before

Apr 15·entry $77.78·now $75.80

AMOM · Weight decrease · 2d

weight 1.400% → 1.370% (-0.030 pp)·stock up 2.2% in the 30 days before

Apr 10·entry $76.42·now $75.80