LVS · LAS VEGAS SANDS

Back to holdings

Las Vegas Sands Corp., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, and operates integrated resorts in Macao and Singapore. It owns and operates The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel, The Londoner Macao, The Parisian Macao, The Plaza Macao and Four Seasons Hotel Macao, and The Sands Macao in Macao, the People's Republic of China; and Marina Bay Sands in Singapore. The company's integrated resorts feature accommodations, gaming, entertainment and retail malls, convention and exhibition facilities, celebrity chef restaurants, and other amenities.

Close · 3M

-14.99%

Held by 0 AI ETFs

None of the tracked AI ETFs currently hold this name.

Signal performance

Each tracked ETF's moves on this stock, grouped by fund. Returns are measured from the signal date to the latest close — hypothetical, no commissions or slippage.

Buy signals7

Win rate0% (0/7)

Avg buy return-6.86%

AIEQno longer held8 signals

AIEQ · Exit · 1d

weight 0.390% → 0 (exited)·stock up 5.7% in the 30 days before

Aug 2·entry $47.28·now $46.23

-2.22%

since Aug 2

AIEQ · Weight increase · 2d

weight 0.370% → 0.390% (+0.020 pp)·stock up 8.0% in the 30 days before

Jul 30·entry $49.87·now $46.23Fresh

-7.30%

since Jul 30

AIEQ · Weight increase · 2d

weight 0.350% → 0.370% (+0.020 pp)·stock down 3.5% in the 30 days before

Jul 26·entry $47.76·now $46.23Fresh

-3.20%

since Jul 26

AIEQ · Weight decrease · 2d

weight 1.090% → 0.360% (-0.730 pp)·stock down 13.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 1·entry $46.25·now $46.23

-0.04%

since Jul 1

AIEQ · Weight decrease · 3d

weight 1.160% → 1.100% (-0.060 pp)·stock down 2.4% in the 30 days before

Jun 18·entry $48.72·now $46.23

-5.11%

since Jun 18

AIEQ · Weight decrease · 2d

weight 1.160% → 1.110% (-0.050 pp)·stock down 4.1% in the 30 days before

Jun 17·entry $48.13·now $46.23

-3.95%

since Jun 17

AIEQ · Weight increase · 2d

weight 1.160% → 1.190% (+0.030 pp)·stock down 2.4% in the 30 days before

Jun 10·entry $50.81·now $46.23Fresh

-9.01%

since Jun 10

AIEQ · New entry · 1d

weight 0 → 1.140% (new)·stock down 5.9% in the 30 days before

May 30·entry $53.27·now $46.23Fresh

-13.22%

since May 30

LQAIno longer held11 signals

LQAI · Exit · 1d

weight 0.550% → 0 (exited)·stock down 9.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 7·entry $46.06·now $46.23

+0.37%

since Jul 7

LQAI · Weight increase · 2d

weight 0.530% → 0.560% (+0.030 pp)·stock down 8.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 2·entry $46.99·now $46.23Fresh

-1.62%

since Jul 2

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

weight 0.550% → 0.530% (-0.020 pp)·stock down 8.7% in the 30 days before

Jun 30·entry $46.19·now $46.23

+0.09%

since Jun 30

LQAI · Weight increase · 2d

weight 0.550% → 0.570% (+0.020 pp)·stock down 3.4% in the 30 days before

Jun 24·entry $47.76·now $46.23Fresh

-3.20%

since Jun 24

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

weight 0.570% → 0.550% (-0.020 pp)·stock down 3.7% in the 30 days before

Jun 22·entry $47.80·now $46.23

-3.28%

since Jun 22

LQAI · Weight decrease · 3d

weight 0.620% → 0.570% (-0.050 pp)·stock down 1.8% in the 30 days before

Jun 15·entry $49.74·now $46.23

-7.06%

since Jun 15

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

weight 0.620% → 0.590% (-0.030 pp)·stock down 1.3% in the 30 days before

Jun 12·entry $50.67·now $46.23

-8.76%

since Jun 12

LQAI · New entry · 1d

weight 0 → 0.620% (new)·stock down 2.7% in the 30 days before

Jun 9·entry $51.65·now $46.23Fresh

-10.49%

since Jun 9

LQAI · Exit · 1d

weight 0.640% → 0 (exited)·stock down 5.7% in the 30 days before

May 12·entry $51.70·now $46.23

-10.58%

since May 12

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

weight 0.680% → 0.640% (-0.040 pp)·stock down 2.6% in the 30 days before

May 11·entry $52.07·now $46.23

-11.22%

since May 11

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

stock down 4.6% in the 30 days before

May 4·entry $51.86·now $46.23

-10.86%

since May 4

Sell signals show what the stock did after the AI exited. A negative number means the AI's exit was well-timed.

Buffett-style framework

Fails the frameworkas of Jul 26

The AI ETF AIEQ shows a recent trend of increasing its weight in Las Vegas Sands, indicating an accumulation strategy. This contrasts with the framework's "Fail" verdict, which is driven by significant data gaps in assessing financial health, management's capital allocation, and ultimately the margin of safety.

Circle of CompetenceWhile the casino and gaming industry is subject to economic cycles and regulatory shifts, the large-scale integrated resort model of Las Vegas Sands allows for a reasonably predictable projection of underlying unit economics for at least ten years.
Economic MoatLas Vegas Sands benefits from substantial capital requirements, regulatory hurdles for licensing, and prime locations in key global gaming markets, which together form a robust and durable economic moat.
ManagementDue to the absence of specific data on management's candor, capital allocation decisions, or ownership stakes, a comprehensive assessment against these criteria is not possible.
Financial HealthThe provided financial data is insufficient to assess crucial metrics like 10-year average ROE, stable operating margins, debt manageability, or owner earnings, making a robust financial health evaluation impossible.
Margin of SafetyWithout a conservative estimate of intrinsic value, which relies on comprehensive financial projections, it is not possible to determine if the current market price offers a sufficient margin of safety.

While Las Vegas Sands operates within a comprehensible circle of competence and possesses a strong economic moat, the analysis is severely hampered by a lack of comprehensive financial data and details on management. The inability to adequately assess financial health, determine owner earnings, or estimate intrinsic value prevents the establishment of a margin of safety, leading to an overall "Fail" verdict within this framework.

Educational interpretation generated by AI applying frameworks Warren Buffett documented in his shareholder letters and other public writings. Not a statement by Mr. Buffett or Berkshire Hathaway, and not investment advice.