as of Jul 21
MNST
DefensiveMONSTER BEVERAGE CORP
Monster Beverage Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in development, marketing, sale, and distribution of energy drink beverages and concentrates in the United States and internationally. The company operates through four segments: Monster Energy Drinks, Strategic Brands, Alcohol Brands, and Other. It offers carbonated non-carbonated energy drinks, ready-to-drink iced teas, lemonades, juice cocktails, single-serve juices and fruit beverages, ready-to-drink dairy and coffee drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks and single-serve still waters, and sodas that are considered natural, sparkling juices, and flavored sparkling beverages.
Close · 3M
+26.05%
Held by 2 AI ETFs
as of Jul 8
Signal performance
Each tracked ETF's moves on this stock, grouped by fund. Returns are measured from the signal date to the latest close — hypothetical, no commissions or slippage.
PQUS · Weight increase · 2d
The AI ranking system employed by Pictet Asset Management for PQUS appears to have systematically increased its exposure to Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) across multiple periodic rebalances. Within the US large-cap universe, the Consumer Staples company’s 18.06% revenue growth likely signaled continued fundamental strength to the AI. Even trading at $96.38, currently 100% of its 52-week high, the system’s concentration and sector-balance rules would facilitate incremental adjustments rather than sudden, large position shifts. This methodical approach, consistent with the fund's measured turnover style and ~165 holdings, led to the observed consecutive weight increases for MNST, such as those from June 27th to June 28th.
weight 0.900% → 0.920% (+0.020 pp)·stock up 8.0% in the 30 days before
Jun 28·entry $97.64·now $95.45Fresh
PQUS · Weight increase · 2d
Pictet Asset Management's AI ranking system for PQUS, which manages approximately 165 US large-cap holdings with periodic rebalances, evidently identified MNST as a higher conviction allocation. The AI's models likely favored MNST's fundamental strength, particularly its 18.06% revenue growth, over other US large-cap consumer staples companies. This resulted in the sequential weight increase from 0.94% to 0.98% detected in late June, suggesting a programmed adjustment during a rebalance period. Even with MNST trading at its 52-week high of $94.70, the algorithm's criteria, possibly emphasizing sustained growth and sector positioning, triggered this measured portfolio adjustment within its sector-balanced framework.
weight 0.940% → 0.980% (+0.040 pp)·stock up 9.6% in the 30 days before
Jun 25·entry $95.83·now $95.45Fresh
PQUS · Weight decrease · 2d
The weight adjustments for MNST in PQUS show a subtle, stepped decrease over recent days, moving from 0.95% to 0.94%. This specific cadence of gradual reduction, rather than an abrupt cut, aligns with PQUS’s stated strategy of measured turnover within its US large-cap portfolio. Such measured selling activity becomes particularly pertinent as MNST shares trade at $91.34, hovering near 98% of its 52-week high after a significant 20.2% return over the past 30 days. The AI ranking system, overseeing its roughly 165 holdings, likely registers the stock's current high valuation metrics—a PER of 43.96 and PBR of 9.08—even as it acknowledges an 18.06% revenue growth and 25.46% ROE. Pictet Asset Management's AI, through these small, periodic adjustments, appears to be managing concentration risk or rebalancing allocations within the consumer staples sector, reflecting a cautious approach to positions at extended price levels consistent with a fund launched recently in 2025 that emphasizes stability.
weight 0.960% → 0.940% (-0.020 pp)·stock up 5.8% in the 30 days before
Jun 20·entry $93.02·now $95.45
PQUS · Weight increase · 2d
Monster Beverage Corp. exhibits a PER of 43.97 and PBR of 9.08, yet its 18.06% revenue growth and 25.46% return on equity appear to align with PQUS's AI ranking system for US large-cap selection. This Pictet-managed ETF, designed for measured turnover, initiated a consecutive weight increase in MNST, raising its allocation from 0.95% on June 11 to 0.97% on June 12. The AI's allocation began as MNST’s price reached $92.03, aligning with its 52-week high after a 19.4% gain over 30 days. This action suggests the algorithm identified fundamental strength and momentum, incorporating sector-balance rules to maintain its diversified portfolio even for a rapidly appreciating asset.
weight 0.930% → 0.970% (+0.040 pp)·stock up 8.0% in the 30 days before
Jun 12·entry $92.83·now $95.45Drifting
PQUS · Weight decrease · 2d
A slight, consecutive weight reduction in MNST, decreasing from 0.98% to 0.97% on May 21st and 22nd, represents a cautious adjustment by PQUS. This measured scaling back aligns with Pictet Asset Management’s AI ranking system, which applies sector-balance and concentration rules across its ~165 US large-cap holdings. Monster Beverage currently trades at $86.32, just 3% shy of its 52-week high, following 30-day returns of 14.0% and 1-year returns of 41.5%. The AI model likely factored in MNST's elevated valuation, with a PER of 41.39 and PBR of 9.08, as a reason for a minor trim. Such periodic rebalancing reflects PQUS’s stated style of US large-cap management with measured turnover, preventing excessive concentration in a single, high-flying consumer staples name.
weight 1.000% → 0.970% (-0.030 pp)·stock up 11.9% in the 30 days before
May 22·entry $86.79·now $95.45
PQUS · Weight decrease · 2d
The AI ETF likely decreased MNST's weight due to its elevated valuation metrics, specifically its high PER of 44.29 and PBR of 9.08, suggesting the stock may be overvalued relative to its growth trajectory or sector peers. For a retail investor, this highlights the importance of scrutinizing high valuation multiples, even for companies with strong fundamentals, as an AI might be rebalancing away from perceived overvaluation to manage portfolio risk.
weight 0.990% → 0.930% (-0.060 pp)·stock up 13.3% in the 30 days before
May 10·entry $86.41·now $95.45
QRFT · New entry · 1d
weight 0 → 0.170% (new)·stock down 10.1% in the 30 days before
Mar 20·entry $73.69·now $95.45Chased
LQAI · Exit · 1d
The LG-Qraft collaboration's LQAI fund, leveraging its Qraft AI ranking system within a ~100-stock US large-cap core universe with weekly rebalancing, decided to fully remove Monster Beverage Corporation from its holdings. This move followed MNST's price reaching its 52-week high of $90.15, reflecting a 16.8% return over the preceding 30 days. The Qraft AI's assessment likely weighed the stock's elevated valuation, such as its PER of 42.6, against its continued growth and the relative attractiveness of other opportunities. For a fund balancing broad large-cap selection without heavy factor tilts, the AI's re-evaluation pointed to a shift towards alternative names that better fit its current ranking criteria.
weight 0.410% → 0 (exited)·stock up 4.5% in the 30 days before
Jun 9·entry $90.15·now $95.45
LQAI · Weight decrease · 3d
The gradual three-day reduction in MNST's weight within LQAI reflects the Qraft AI engine's dynamic response to the stock's current market position. MNST, trading at $86.79—nearly 98% of its 52-week high after a 15.5% 30-day return—presents a scenario where its recent price appreciation might trigger a re-evaluation of its attractiveness. Although the company exhibits revenue growth of 18.06% and ROE of 25.46%, its PER of 41.39 and PBR of 9.08 indicate a premium valuation. The AI's ranking, operating on a core large-cap universe without a heavy factor tilt, likely registers the stock approaching an upper boundary or experiencing diminishing incremental returns from a risk-adjusted perspective, leading to a measured, progressive reduction in allocation, characteristic of its weekly rebalancing schedule. This move indicates the AI's algorithm is moderating exposure to a high-flying stock that might be nearing a peak relative to its intrinsic value or risk metrics.
weight 0.430% → 0.400% (-0.030 pp)·stock up 13.7% in the 30 days before
May 21·entry $86.32·now $95.45
LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d
Monster Beverage Corp. currently trades near its 52-week high at $86.88, reflecting a 14.0% return in the last 30 days and 44.5% over the past year. This rapid ascent placed the stock at 98% of its 52-week range, prompting a re-evaluation by the Qraft AI engine that governs LQAI's weekly rebalances. Despite the company's 18.06% revenue growth and 25.46% ROE, its PER of 41.39 and PBR of 9.08, combined with the stock's proximity to its annual peak, likely signaled a reduced attractiveness within the AI's core large-cap universe. Consequently, LQAI's exposure to MNST decreased consecutively from 0.43% to 0.41% between May 18 and May 20, as the AI adjusted its ranking, moving away from a holding whose valuation characteristics became less aligned with its selection methodology. This action aligns with LQAI's style, which prioritizes AI-driven name selection without a heavy factor tilt, positioning it between broad market and concentrated momentum strategies.
weight 0.430% → 0.410% (-0.020 pp)·stock up 15.4% in the 30 days before
May 20·entry $86.88·now $95.45
LQAI · Weight increase · 2d
MNST's P/E of 42.0 and P/B of 9.08, combined with an 18.06% revenue growth and 25.46% ROE, present a profile the LG-Qraft collaboration's AI ranking system identified as suitable for its US large-cap core universe. The Qraft AI engine initiated exposure to Monster Beverage in LQAI on May 12th at 0.4100% and subsequently increased its weight to 0.4300% by May 18th across weekly rebalances. This consistent accumulation began as MNST’s price reached $88.54, positioning it at 100% of its 52-week high and following a significant 30-day return of +22.2%. The sustained allocation for this consumer staples company, despite its elevated price point, indicates the AI model continued to perceive strong underlying signals aligning with LQAI's AI-driven selection process.
weight 0.400% → 0.430% (+0.030 pp)·stock up 15.4% in the 30 days before
May 18·entry $88.54·now $95.45Drifting
LQAI · New entry · 1d
The AI-managed ETF likely initiated a position in MNST due to its exceptional profitability, evidenced by a high ROE, and strong revenue growth, indicating a robust business despite its premium valuation metrics. For retail investors, this suggests it is important to look beyond traditional high P/E or P/B ratios and evaluate a company's fundamental growth and efficiency when assessing investment opportunities, as sophisticated algorithms do.
weight 0 → 0.410% (new)·stock up 14.2% in the 30 days before
May 12·entry $85.87·now $95.45Chased
AIEQ · Exit · 1d
The portfolio adjustment for MNST featured a consistent allocation around 0.26-0.27% throughout the latter half of May, culminating in an immediate, full removal on the 30th, indicating a sharp decision rather than a gradual reduction. This rapid divestment aligns with AIEQ’s strategy, which employs IBM Watson NLP to process real-time news and social posts for its daily rebalancing and high-turnover portfolio. With MONSTER BVRG CORP trading at $88.08, close to its 52-week high of $89.24, and having generated a 14.8% return over 30 days, the AI’s sentiment analysis likely detected a peak in positive sentiment or identified new information suggesting an increased risk at this valuation. Even with the company's 18.06% revenue growth and 25.46% ROE, the fund's broad market, fundamentals and sentiment hybrid approach would weigh the elevated PER of 42.39 and PBR of 9.08 against any perceived shift in market perception, triggering the swift exit through EquBot’s risk overlay.
weight 0.270% → 0 (exited)·stock up 14.6% in the 30 days before
May 30·entry $89.10·now $95.45
Sell signals show what the stock did after the AI exited. A negative number means the AI's exit was well-timed.
Buffett-style framework
AI ETFs show mixed activity: PQUS maintains a holding with minor recent fluctuations, while LQAI has exited its position. This contrasts with a Buffett-style 'Fail' verdict, which primarily stems from the lack of a margin of safety at current valuation multiples. The AI's decisions may reflect differing priorities such as growth momentum over conservative pricing.
- Circle of CompetenceThe consumer staples nature and established brand in the beverage industry suggest reasonably predictable unit economics for long-term cash flow projection.
- Economic MoatMonster Beverage benefits from significant brand power and an established distribution network in the energy drink market, creating a durable competitive advantage.
- ManagementAssessment of management's candor, capital allocation discipline, and skin in the game is not possible with the limited financial data provided.
- Financial HealthWhile the reported ROE of 25.46% is strong, a comprehensive assessment of 10-year average ROE, operating margins, debt levels, and owner earnings is not possible with the provided limited financial data.
- Margin of SafetyThe high P/E (43.96) and EV/EBITDA (42.13) multiples suggest the market has priced in significant future growth, leaving little room for a conservative margin of safety.
Monster Beverage successfully meets the initial criteria for a predictable business with a strong economic moat due to its brand power and distribution. However, an incomplete picture of financial health and management quality, combined with a current share price that offers no margin of safety based on very high valuation multiples, leads to a 'Fail' verdict in this framework.
Educational interpretation generated by AI applying frameworks Warren Buffett documented in his shareholder letters and other public writings. Not a statement by Mr. Buffett or Berkshire Hathaway, and not investment advice.