LQAI1.910%
as of Jul 17
F
GrowthFORD MOTOR CO
Ford Motor Company develops, delivers, and services Ford trucks, sport utility vehicles, commercial vans and cars, and Lincoln luxury vehicles in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Mexico, and internationally. It operates through Ford Blue, Ford Model e, Ford Pro, and Ford Credit segments. The company sells Ford and Lincoln internal combustion engine and hybrid vehicles, electric vehicles, service parts, accessories, and digital services for retail customers; develops EV and digital vehicle technologies, and software; and provides telematics and EV charging solutions.
Close · 3M
+14.77%
Held by 3 AI ETFs
Signal performance
Each tracked ETF's moves on this stock, grouped by fund. Returns are measured from the signal date to the latest close — hypothetical, no commissions or slippage.
Buy signals16
Win rate19% (3/16)
Avg buy return-7.25%
LQAI · Accumulation · 5d
LQAI has shown a consistent, gradual accumulation in Ford Motor Co. shares, steadily increasing its allocation from 1.78% to 1.91% over approximately ten trading days. This measured cadence, enabled by Qraft's weekly rebalancing and AI-driven selection, occurs while F's stock price has recently pulled back by 7.2% over 30 days to $14.23, yet maintains a 1-year return of 22.8%. For this core large-cap fund, the AI's persistent buying suggests it identifies developing potential in the Consumer Discretionary company, even with current financial metrics like an N/A PER and a -14.72% ROE, indicating a view that transcends traditional trailing fundamental analysis.
weight 1.780% → 1.910% (+0.130 pp)·stock down 1.2% in the 30 days before
Jul 17·entry $14.23·now $13.99Fresh
-1.69%
since Jul 17
LQAI · Weight increase · 2d
Ford Motor Co.'s financial profile, marked by a negative ROE of -14.72% and a N/A PER, suggests a divergence from typical fundamental screening, yet LQAI's Qraft AI model increased its weighting. This selection by the LG-Qraft collaboration, which applies AI ranking without heavy factor tilt, indicates the algorithm prioritizes dynamic signals over these specific static traditional metrics. The consistent increase in F's weight, from 1.76% to 1.88% between July 10th and 16th, occurred while the stock was trading around its current $14.23 price point. This sequence followed a -7.2% 30-day return, highlighting the AI's weekly rebalancing mechanism identifying a positive signal for the core large-cap stock despite recent price weakness, reflecting the ETF's position midway between broad and concentrated momentum styles.
weight 1.820% → 1.880% (+0.060 pp)·stock down 3.9% in the 30 days before
Jul 16·entry $14.19·now $13.99Fresh
-1.41%
since Jul 16
LQAI · Weight increase · 2d
F is currently priced at $13.85, residing at 79% of its 52-week high, following a notable 20.6% decline over the last 30 days despite positive 90-day and 1-year returns of 8.1% and 27.6%, respectively. This specific combination of a recent significant pullback from higher levels within a longer-term upward trend likely cued the Qraft AI engine, which manages LQAI’s US large-cap core portfolio with weekly rebalances, to increase exposure. Consequently, F's weight within LQAI jumped from 0.3600% on July 6th to 1.7800% on July 7th, continuing to 1.8200% by July 13th, indicating the AI's conviction during this price movement. While F exhibits a negative ROE of -14.72% and 3.82% revenue growth, its 1.45 PBR in conjunction with the stock's recent price trajectory suggests Qraft's AI algorithm, operating without heavy factor tilts, identifies potential beyond immediate profitability, possibly valuing the stock following its dip.
weight 1.760% → 1.820% (+0.060 pp)·stock down 3.1% in the 30 days before
Jul 13·entry $13.85·now $13.99Fresh
+1.01%
since Jul 13
LQAI · Weight increase · 2d
Ford Motor Co. exhibits a PBR of 1.45 alongside 3.82% revenue growth, although its ROE stands at a negative -14.72%. These financial characteristics indicate that the Qraft AI selection engine, which guides LQAI's US large-cap core portfolio, is not solely prioritizing traditional profitability metrics. The substantial increase in Ford’s weight to 1.78% on 2026-07-07, from its prior 0.36%, coincided with the stock trading at $13.56 after a -9.2% 30-day return. LQAI's AI-driven methodology, which balances broad and concentrated momentum styles without a heavy factor tilt, likely identified an emergent signal in Ford's recent price depreciation and current valuation, triggering this significant upward rebalance.
weight 0.350% → 1.780% (+1.430 pp)·stock down 11.6% in the 30 days before
Jul 7·entry $13.56·now $13.99Drifting
+3.17%
since Jul 7
LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d
The LG-Qraft collaboration's LQAI, leveraging its Qraft AI ranking for weekly rebalances across ~100 US large caps, implemented a sequential reduction in its Ford Motor Co. weighting. Observing this pattern from 0.3900% down to 0.3500% between June 9th and June 18th indicates the AI is scaling back exposure. Despite Ford's 30-day price return of +15.4% and its current position at 81% of its 52-week high, the AI's core large-cap selection method, which avoids heavy factor tilt, likely weighed fundamental concerns. Specifically, a negative ROE of -14.72% may have prompted the AI to reduce the stock's allocation, prioritizing underlying stability over recent price momentum.
weight 0.370% → 0.350% (-0.020 pp)·stock up 7.7% in the 30 days before
Jun 18·entry $14.06·now $13.99
-0.50%
since Jun 18
LQAI · Weight decrease · 3d
Ford's N/A PER and negative -14.72% ROE, combined with a modest 3.82% revenue growth, represent fundamental metrics that LG-Qraft's AI engine likely increasingly disfavored within its core large-cap selection framework, which avoids heavy factor tilts. Despite the stock's recent price strength, including a 30-day return of +16.8% and trading at $14.30, 82% of its 52-week high, the Qraft AI recalibrated F's position, weighing the elevated price against these underlying profitability challenges. This led to a sharp rebalance on June 9th, where LQAI substantially reduced F's allocation from 2.27% to 0.39% following prior gradual decreases, signaling a significant shift in the AI's ranking during the weekly review. The decisive reduction in F for LQAI specifically reflects the AI's re-evaluation of a company showing strong recent price momentum but lacking current earnings and profitability, pushing it out of favor for a fund positioned between broad and concentrated momentum strategies.
weight 2.290% → 0.380% (-1.910 pp)·stock up 18.7% in the 30 days before
Jun 10·entry $14.30·now $13.99
-2.17%
since Jun 10
LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d
LQAI, managed with Qraft AI's ranking applied to its approximately 100 US large-cap core holdings, significantly reduced its Ford Motor Co. allocation through its weekly rebalancing process on June 9th. This decisive move followed several days of gradual weight decreases, indicating a continuous re-evaluation by the AI engine. Despite Ford's recent price momentum, evidenced by a 30-day return of +20.6%, the AI's model likely flagged underlying concerns beyond short-term market performance. A key factor driving the Qraft AI's shift was likely Ford's reported Return on Equity (ROE) of -14.72%, signaling fundamental profitability challenges that contrast with the stable core large-cap profile LQAI typically seeks. The AI's selection method, which avoids heavy factor tilts, would scrutinize such financial metrics intensely when assigning rankings within its universe.
weight 2.290% → 0.390% (-1.900 pp)·stock up 21.3% in the 30 days before
Jun 9·entry $14.95·now $13.99
-6.42%
since Jun 9
-8.80%
since Jun 4
-10.95%
since Jun 3
-13.37%
since Jun 2
-15.87%
since Jun 1
-19.78%
since May 29
-15.98%
since May 28
PQUS · Weight decrease · 2d
Ford Motor Co. trades at $13.36, representing 77% of its 52-week high, after posting a -5.9% 90-day return following a more positive 26.2% over the past year. The PQUS AI ranking system initiated a consecutive weight decrease for Ford, from 0.44% to 0.40% between July 1st and July 3rd, 2026. This move by the AI, managing a large-cap US portfolio with periodic rebalances, likely reflects a re-evaluation of the company's financial health. A negative ROE of -14.72% and the reported N/A PER could signal concerns regarding profitability, even with 3.82% revenue growth. Given PQUS's measured turnover style, this targeted reduction indicates the AI's algorithm weighed the current profitability challenges against the recent price trajectory within its US large-cap selection process.
weight 0.440% → 0.400% (-0.040 pp)·stock down 17.3% in the 30 days before
Jul 3·entry $13.83·now $13.99
+1.16%
since Jul 3
PQUS · Weight increase · 2d
F's recent financial summary indicates a PBR of 1.45 and revenue growth of 3.82%, alongside a negative ROE of -14.72%. This financial profile suggests PQUS's AI ranking system, designed for US large-caps with measured turnover, may prioritize factors beyond immediate profitability, potentially focusing on valuation relative to assets or sales growth within its universe. The consecutive weight increase for F within PQUS, observed from 2026-06-26, occurred after the stock experienced a 30-day price decline of 2.4%. With the stock currently trading at $14.13, which is 81% of its 52-week high, the Pictet Asset Management AI likely identified this level as a strategic entry point for a measured portfolio adjustment. This move adheres to the fund's sector-balance and concentration rules within its ~165 US large-cap universe, capitalizing on the recent dip following F's positive 35.5% 1-year return.
weight 0.360% → 0.440% (+0.080 pp)·stock down 11.0% in the 30 days before
Jun 27·entry $14.02·now $13.99Fresh
-0.21%
since Jun 27
-8.80%
since Jun 4
-15.87%
since May 31
-15.87%
since May 30
-19.78%
since May 29
BUZZ · Exit · 1d
Ford Motor Co. exhibits a negative Return on Equity of -14.72% alongside a revenue growth of 3.82% for a Consumer Discretionary company. Although BUZZ's algorithmic sentiment tracker does not screen based on traditional financial metrics, these underlying figures likely contributed to a decline in the positive-sentiment intensity detected by its NLP model across social media and news. The complete removal of F from the portfolio on 2026-07-16, following several days of weights hovering around 0.44% to 0.47%, coincides with the stock's recent 30-day return of -7.2%. This recent price decline, despite a more positive 90-day return, probably triggered a deterioration in the collective digital sentiment, causing the stock to fall below the required threshold for inclusion during the monthly index reconstitution that BUZZ tracks.
weight 0.470% → 0 (exited)·stock down 3.9% in the 30 days before
Jul 16·entry $14.19·now $13.99
-1.41%
since Jul 16
BUZZ · Weight increase · 2d
FORD MOTOR CO (F) currently trades at $13.94, placing it at 80% of its 52-week high after a recent 30-day return of -16.2%, contrasting with positive longer-term trends. This price movement likely ignited increased discussions and a shift in sentiment across social media platforms, blogs, and news, which is precisely what the BUZZ ETF's NLP algorithm is designed to detect. The consecutive weight increases in BUZZ, from 0.43% to 0.45% on July 10th and further to 0.46% by July 13th, indicate that the algorithmic sentiment tracker registered a strengthening positive intensity for Ford. While the company's financials show a negative ROE of -14.72% and revenue growth of 3.82%, the ETF, functioning as a retail-crowd signal, adjusted its portfolio to reflect this perceived rise in public favor rather than focusing on traditional fundamental metrics like its PBR of 1.45.
weight 0.430% → 0.460% (+0.030 pp)·stock down 3.1% in the 30 days before
Jul 13·entry $13.85·now $13.99Fresh
+1.01%
since Jul 13
BUZZ · Weight decrease · 4d
Ford Motor Co’s negative ROE of -14.72% and a PBR of 1.45 are not direct drivers for BUZZ, which operates as an algorithmic sentiment tracker rather than a fund focused on fundamental value. The observed consecutive weight decrease for F, from 0.4700% on June 25 to 0.4300% by July 1, indicates a sustained decline in its positive-sentiment intensity as captured by BUZZ’s NLP analysis of social media and news. This reduction in F’s allocation, occurring while the stock trades at $13.36—approximately 77% of its 52-week high after a 90-day return of -5.9%—suggests weakening positive crowd sentiment. BUZZ's monthly rebalancing adjusts portfolio holdings to reflect such shifts in collective opinion, positioning it as a proxy for the retail-crowd signal.
weight 0.470% → 0.430% (-0.040 pp)·stock down 18.0% in the 30 days before
Jul 1·entry $13.64·now $13.99
+2.57%
since Jul 1
BUZZ · Weight decrease · 3d
Ford's weighting in BUZZ experienced a consistent, daily decrease from 0.47% to 0.44% across the final four trading days of June, marking a gradual rather than abrupt reduction. This measured drawdown aligns with the ETF's strategy of tracking the BUZZ NextGen AI US Sentiment Leaders Index, suggesting a slow diffusion of positive sentiment among the social media and news sources it analyzes, even as Ford maintained a 30-day price gain of 4.4%. Such a steady decline in allocation suggests the NLP algorithms detected a fading "retail-crowd signal" for a stock currently trading at 78% of its 52-week high, rather than a sharp reversal. For a company with a negative ROE of -14.72%, sustained positive social sentiment might naturally dissipate over time, leading to lower rankings within the index and the observed sequential weight adjustments during monthly reconstitution periods.
weight 0.470% → 0.440% (-0.030 pp)·stock down 20.3% in the 30 days before
Jun 30·entry $13.90·now $13.99
+0.65%
since Jun 30
BUZZ · Weight decrease · 2d
Ford Motor Co. is currently trading at $13.90, positioned at 80% of its 52-week high after a significant 1-year return of +33.4%, although its 90-day return sits at -0.8% despite a recent +6.7% gain over 30 days. The BUZZ ETF, which passively tracks US large and mid-cap stocks by analyzing positive sentiment intensity from social media, blogs, and news via NLP, detected a shift in public perception for Ford. This algorithmic sentiment tracker registered diminishing positive buzz, leading to consecutive decreases in Ford's indexed weight from 0.47% to 0.45% in late June. This erosion of sentiment could stem from underlying financial indicators like the company's negative ROE of -14.72% or a price-to-book ratio of 1.45, which may temper positive social discussions even amid recent price fluctuations.
weight 0.470% → 0.450% (-0.020 pp)·stock down 15.8% in the 30 days before
Jun 29·entry $14.02·now $13.99
-0.21%
since Jun 29
BUZZ · Weight increase · 3d
Currently trading at $13.84, F sits at 79% of its 52-week high, buoyed by a +15.4% return over the last 30 days, following a period that saw a -2.0% 90-day return but a +29.8% 1-year return. This recent upward price trajectory likely intensified the positive sentiment captured by BUZZ’s NLP engine, which scans social media, blogs, and news for discussion around companies. The algorithmic sentiment tracker responded by initiating a position on June 18th at 0.43% and subsequently increasing F’s weight to 0.44% and then 0.45% in the following days, indicating a sustained increase in collective positive online discussion. This allocation occurred despite F reporting a negative ROE of -14.72%, with BUZZ’s methodology prioritizing the market mood reflected in its 1.45 PBR and 3.82% revenue growth over traditional profitability metrics during its monthly index rebalancing. The consecutive weight increases directly reflect the ETF's passive holding of stocks ranked by positive-sentiment intensity, which picked up on F's recent momentum.
weight 0 → 0.450% (new)·stock up 2.4% in the 30 days before
Jun 23·entry $14.00·now $13.99Fresh
-0.07%
since Jun 23
BUZZ · Weight increase · 2d
Ford Motor Co.'s PBR of 1.45, revenue growth of 3.82%, and negative ROE of -14.72% illustrate fundamental metrics that are not direct triggers for BUZZ, an algorithmic sentiment tracker focused on social media and news. The consecutive weight increase for F, beginning June 18th from zero to 0.43% and then 0.44%, follows a period where the stock registered a 30-day return of +16.2%. This shift reflects the index's NLP system detecting a surge in positive-sentiment intensity for Ford. As F traded at $14.00, positioned at 80% of its 52-week high, the accumulating positive online discourse likely prompted its inclusion and subsequent modest weighting within BUZZ, signaling a retail-crowd-driven interest.
weight 0 → 0.440% (new)·stock up 6.7% in the 30 days before
Jun 22·entry $14.11·now $13.99Fresh
-0.85%
since Jun 22
BUZZ · New entry · 1d
weight 0 → 0.430% (new)·stock up 7.7% in the 30 days before
Jun 18·entry $14.06·now $13.99Fresh
-0.50%
since Jun 18
AIEQ · Exit · 1d
Amplify's AIEQ, powered by IBM Watson NLP, continuously processes market information, driving its daily rebalancing and high turnover strategy across its 140-180 stock portfolio. This AI-driven approach, blending fundamentals and sentiment, would have closely monitored Ford Motor Co, where a reported ROE of -14.72% points to challenges in profitability. Despite a recent 30-day return of +4.4% for F, the continuous real-time analysis of news, filings, and social posts likely identified a negative shift in either fundamental outlook or market sentiment. The EquBot system, integrating this input, determined Ford no longer met its criteria, resulting in the removal of the stock from the portfolio on July 1st, 2026.
weight 0.060% → 0 (exited)·stock down 18.0% in the 30 days before
Jul 1·entry $13.64·now $13.99
+2.57%
since Jul 1
Sell signals show what the stock did after the AI exited. A negative number means the AI's exit was well-timed.
Buffett-style framework
Too hard to callas of Jun 28
Several AI ETFs, including BUZZ and PQUS, have shown recent accumulation trends for Ford, suggesting a positive outlook on the company. This contrasts with the framework's 'Too Hard' verdict, which indicates that the automotive industry's inherent unpredictability makes it unsuitable for a long-term value assessment, regardless of current market sentiment.
- Circle of CompetenceThe automotive industry's ongoing transition to electric vehicles and technological disruption makes projecting Ford's unit economics and future cash flows with ten-year visibility highly unpredictable.
- Economic MoatA durable economic moat cannot be reliably assessed when the business's fundamental earning power and future industry structure are too unpredictable.
- ManagementA detailed evaluation of management's capital allocation and integrity is not applicable when the underlying business is outside the circle of competence.
- Financial HealthLong-term financial health and owner earnings cannot be reliably evaluated when the business environment prevents stable ten-year cash flow projections.
- Margin of SafetyEstimating intrinsic value and identifying a margin of safety is not possible without predictable future cash flows from which to derive a conservative valuation.
Ford Motor Company is deemed 'Too Hard' for a deep value investment analysis because the significant disruption within the automotive industry prevents reliable ten-year projections of unit economics and future cash flows. This unpredictability means the framework cannot confidently assess a durable economic moat, management's effectiveness, financial health, or a margin of safety.
Educational interpretation generated by AI applying frameworks Warren Buffett documented in his shareholder letters and other public writings. Not a statement by Mr. Buffett or Berkshire Hathaway, and not investment advice.