INTC

LQAI · Weight decrease · 3d

INTEL CORP’s negative ROE of -2.95% and modest revenue growth of 1.36%, coupled with its PER of 22.62, likely factored into LQAI's AI-driven selection engine adjusting its outlook for this core large-cap holding. This is consistent with an AI that doesn't exhibit heavy factor tilt and balances various fundamental metrics. The Qraft AI system initiated consecutive weight decreases in INTC on July 15, 16, and 17, moving from 3.29% to 3.11%, as the company experienced a -15.0% 30-day return and settled at $95.04, 67% below its 52-week high. Following a 1-year return of +332.0%, LQAI's weekly rebalancing mechanism appears to have systematically reduced exposure, reflecting the AI model's re-evaluation of INTC's position amidst anemic growth and negative profitability during this price consolidation phase.

weight 3.420% → 3.110% (-0.310 pp)·stock down 18.8% in the 30 days before

Jul 17·entry $95.04·now $97.06

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

LQAI’s Qraft AI selection engine, designed for a US large-cap core universe and rebalancing weekly, triggered the recent consecutive weight decrease in INTC. Managing approximately 100 US large caps, the fund's AI likely adjusted INTC's ranking as the stock's short-term market dynamics shifted. The observed reduction in weight from 3.42% on July 14th to 3.13% on July 16th coincided with INTC’s 30-day return showing a -15.0% decline. This downward adjustment, even for a core holding, reflects the AI's sensitivity to current stock performance and potentially, underlying fundamental weaknesses like the reported negative ROE of -2.95%.

weight 3.420% → 3.130% (-0.290 pp)·stock down 24.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 16·entry $96.98·now $97.06

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

LQAI, managed through the Qraft AI ranking engine applied to its weekly rebalanced portfolio of approximately 100 US large-cap core stocks, systematically reduced its INTC holding. The consecutive weight decreases from 3.7000% on July 1st to 3.3000% by July 13th indicate the AI's model identified deteriorating signals for the stock. While INTC delivered a +360.4% 1-year return, its recent 30-day return of -10.1% and a negative ROE of -2.95% likely prompted the AI's adjustment. This tactical shift aligns with the fund's style of AI-driven name selection, dynamically responding to evolving market and financial metrics rather than maintaining static allocations.

weight 3.550% → 3.300% (-0.250 pp)·stock down 3.7% in the 30 days before

Jul 13·entry $103.12·now $97.06

LQAI · Weight decrease · 2d

stock up 11.5% in the 30 days before

Jul 2·entry $120.35·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 3d

Qraft Technologies' AMOM, which prioritizes names expected to extend their runs within its concentrated ~50 US large-cap portfolio, systematically reduced its INTC allocation over consecutive trading days. This multi-signal momentum composite, rebalancing weekly, likely identified a material break in INTC's previously strong price trend. Specifically, the -15.0% 30-day return signaled that INTC's momentum was faltering rather than continuing, prompting the AI to unwind positions. The AI's comprehensive analysis, including fundamental momentum signals, likely also weighed INTC's negative ROE of -2.95%, indicating a lack of underlying business strength to support further upward trajectory. This strategic unwinding aligns with the fund's method of picking assets with continued conviction, not simply holding past performers.

weight 2.880% → 2.690% (-0.190 pp)·stock down 18.8% in the 30 days before

Jul 17·entry $95.04·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 2d

AMOM's multi-signal momentum composite, designed to pick around 50 US large caps expected to extend their runs rather than mechanically holding top performers, likely initiated a series of reductions in its INTC position during its weekly rebalance due to a shift in its forward-looking signals. The fund's concentrated momentum sleeve, where position changes carry conviction by design, points to a clear signal that INTC's momentum profile was deteriorating. This sustained divestment, evidenced by the weight falling from 3.0700% to 2.7500% over nine days, aligns with INTC's recent 30-day return of -15.0%, which would flag a significant break in its prior upward trend for a fund seeking continuation. Furthermore, fundamental signals like INTC's -2.95% ROE could have contributed to the algorithmic re-evaluation, suggesting that other momentum factors beyond price alone signaled a decline in conviction.

weight 2.880% → 2.750% (-0.130 pp)·stock down 24.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 16·entry $96.98·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 7d

The gradual, persistent daily reduction in INTC’s weight from 3.71% to 2.82% over approximately two weeks suggests AMOM’s multi-signal momentum composite is systematically reducing exposure. This measured decrease aligns with the ETF’s strategy of picking names expected to extend their runs, indicating a loss of conviction that INTC’s recent, significant price surge — including a 1-year return of +360.4% — will continue. Despite this long-term gain, the recent 30-day return of -10.1% combined with the company’s negative ROE and low revenue growth of 1.36% likely triggered AMOM’s earnings revisions and fundamental momentum signals. This calibrated reduction in a concentrated momentum sleeve reflects a strategic shift away from a stock where the previous momentum is faltering and underlying financials do not support further extension at a current price of $103.12.

weight 3.710% → 2.820% (-0.890 pp)·stock down 3.7% in the 30 days before

Jul 13·entry $103.12·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 7d

The persistent, gradual decrease in INTC's weight within the AMOM portfolio, spanning ten trading days from 3.89% to 2.96%, reflects the AI manager's systematic response to shifts in the stock's momentum profile. This deliberate, stepped reduction aligns with Qraft Technologies' approach of rebalancing weekly and picking names expected to extend their runs, rather than simply chasing past performance. Following a substantial 90-day return of +154.8% and a 30-day price decline of 9.1% from its recent highs, the model likely detected a deceleration in INTC's "run extension potential" across its multi-signal composite, including price trends and potentially less compelling fundamental momentum given the 1.36% revenue growth and negative ROE. The concentrated nature of AMOM's ~50-stock basket means these consistent daily adjustments indicate a conviction in de-risking exposure to INTC as its price trajectory weakens from its peak of $140.94, currently trading at $109.84.

weight 3.890% → 2.960% (-0.930 pp)·stock up 1.8% in the 30 days before

Jul 10·entry $109.84·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 6d

Qraft's AMOM, designed to identify stocks expected to extend their runs based on a multi-signal momentum composite, likely reacted to Intel's negative ROE of -2.95% and revenue growth of just 1.36%. These financial figures represent a clear absence of the fundamental momentum that is a core signal for the ETF's selection process. Given the concentrated nature of AMOM's momentum sleeve, such profitability and growth metrics strongly challenge the conviction needed to maintain a significant position in INTC. The consecutive daily weight reduction observed from July 1st through July 9th specifically aligns with Intel's recent 30-day return of -9.1% from its current $109.84 price, indicating a deterioration in price trends after its significant prior rallies. This shift suggests the AI manager identified Intel, currently at 78% of its 52-week high, as less likely to continue its upward trajectory, prompting the systematic reduction rather than holding mechanically.

weight 3.890% → 3.020% (-0.870 pp)·stock up 2.1% in the 30 days before

Jul 9·entry $112.54·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 5d

The sequence of daily weight reductions for INTC, decreasing from 3.71% to 3.03% over several trading days in early July, directly reflects a breakdown in the stock's momentum. After delivering a 1-year return of +396.6%, Intel's recent 30-day return of -10.8% at a price point of $110.24 likely triggered AMOM's multi-signal momentum composite to flag that the company was no longer positioned to extend its run. Qraft Technologies' method, which emphasizes continuing positive trends for its concentrated momentum sleeve, initiated these consistent trims due to the stock's recent price reversal and its negative ROE of -2.95%, alongside modest 1.36% revenue growth. This sustained reduction, facilitated by AMOM's weekly rebalancing, indicates a clear shift away from INTC as its signals no longer align with the fund's core objective.

weight 3.890% → 3.030% (-0.860 pp)·stock up 11.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 8·entry $110.24·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 4d

stock down 1.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 7·entry $110.39·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 3d

stock up 8.4% in the 30 days before

Jul 6·entry $122.20·now $97.06

AMOM · Weight decrease · 2d

stock up 11.5% in the 30 days before

Jul 2·entry $120.35·now $97.06

BUZZ · Weight decrease · 2d

The detected consecutive weight decrease for Intel within BUZZ reflects the ETF's methodology of passively ranking stocks by positive-sentiment intensity. BUZZ employs NLP over social media, blogs, and news to select its approximately 75 large/mid cap holdings, rebalancing monthly to mirror prevailing public opinion. This observed trend for INTC correlates with the stock's recent 30-day return of -15.0%, a performance dip likely dampening positive retail-crowd sentiment. Given BUZZ operates as an algorithmic sentiment tracker closely attuned to these collective signals, its reduced allocation to Intel suggests a measurable decline in public enthusiasm during this period.

weight 2.580% → 2.430% (-0.150 pp)·stock down 24.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 16·entry $96.98·now $97.06

BUZZ · Weight decrease · 2d

BUZZ, an algorithmic sentiment tracker, reduced its weighting in INTC consistently from 2.93% to 2.48% between July 1st and July 13th, reflecting a decline in positive sentiment intensity detected by its NLP method across social media and news sources. This adjustment, typical for the fund which tracks ~75 US large/mid caps and rebalances its index monthly, suggests that INTC's standing among the retail crowd has diminished. The recent 30-day return of -1.4% for INTC, contrasting sharply with its substantial 90-day and 1-year gains, likely contributed to a shift in public perception. As BUZZ passively holds stocks based on these sentiment rankings, this sustained decrease indicates the market's collective mood toward INTC has cooled, potentially influenced by financial metrics such as its negative ROE of -2.95%.

weight 2.620% → 2.480% (-0.140 pp)·stock down 3.7% in the 30 days before

Jul 13·entry $103.12·now $97.06

BUZZ · Weight decrease · 2d

Intel's PER of 22.62, PBR of 1.53, and a negative ROE of -2.95%, alongside 1.36% revenue growth, likely contributed to a moderation of the positive sentiment detected by BUZZ’s NLP engine. These figures, while not directly driving the algorithmic sentiment tracker's decisions, influence the social media discussions and news sentiment the ETF monitors. The series of weight reductions in BUZZ for INTC, observed from July 1st to July 8th, occurred as Intel shares had recently posted a -7.6% 30-day return, trading at $112.54, which is 80% of its 52-week high. This recent price weakness, following a period of 90-day and 1-year returns of +147.3% and +400.2% respectively, indicates that the crowd-sourced optimism captured by BUZZ’s sentiment analysis began to cool. As a fund tracking sentiment intensity among retail-like signals, the observed consecutive decrease in INTC's weighting from 2.93% to 2.61% reflects a measured decline in positive social perception for a stock that had seen significant previous appreciation but now faces recent headwinds.

weight 2.820% → 2.610% (-0.210 pp)·stock up 11.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 8·entry $110.24·now $97.06

BUZZ · Weight decrease · 2d

stock up 11.5% in the 30 days before

Jul 2·entry $120.35·now $97.06

QRFT · Weight decrease · 2d

stock up 11.5% in the 30 days before

Jul 2·entry $120.35·now $97.06

AIVL · Weight decrease · 3d

INTC currently trades at $95.04, which places it at 67% of its 52-week high, following a 15.0% decline in the last 30 days despite recording a 103.2% gain over 90 days and a 332.0% increase over the past year. WisdomTree's AIVL, which employs AI to score US value stocks based on fundamentals like return on capital and valuation metrics such as P/E and P/B, likely re-assessed INTC's position within its portfolio universe. The AI's process would have noted INTC's negative ROE of -2.95% alongside its P/E of 22.62, which stands against the background of its 1.36% revenue growth. This combination of recent price retraction from prior rapid appreciation and fundamental data points indicating profitability challenges likely prompted the AI's determination that INTC's value proposition was diminishing for AIVL, leading to the consecutive weight decrease from 1.1587% to 1.0616% between July 15th and July 17th.

weight 1.215% → 1.062% (-0.153 pp)·stock down 18.8% in the 30 days before

Jul 17·entry $95.04·now $97.06

AIVL · Weight decrease · 2d

INTC's Return on Equity of -2.95% indicates an erosion of value, a fundamental metric AIVL’s AI uses to differentiate genuine value from potential value traps within its pre-filtered US value pool. Despite a PBR of 1.53 and PER of 22.62, which align with a value factor, its 1.36% revenue growth offers limited positive counterpoint. This observed pattern of consecutive weight decrease, specifically the recent decline from 1.1587% on July 15th to 1.0760% on July 16th, closely followed INTC's 30-day return of -15.0%. This portfolio adjustment reflects AIVL’s AI scoring INTC lower on its fundamental criteria, perhaps interpreting the recent price decline and negative ROE as confirmation of a value trap, especially after the prior 1-year return of +332.0% placed the current price at 67% of its 52-week high.

weight 1.215% → 1.076% (-0.139 pp)·stock down 24.2% in the 30 days before

Jul 16·entry $96.98·now $97.06

AIVL · Weight decrease · 2d

AIVL has been consistently decreasing its allocation to INTC, signaling a re-evaluation of the stock within its value-tilted universe. This gradual reduction aligns with WisdomTree’s AI-driven method, which screens for genuine value while actively seeking to distinguish it from potential value traps. While INTC's PBR remains low at 1.53, its negative ROE of -2.95% and low 1.36% revenue growth, coupled with a PER of 22.62, reveal fundamental weaknesses that a value-trap detector would weigh heavily. The stock's dramatic 90-day return of +134.5% and 1-year return of +371.6% means its price has appreciated significantly without a corresponding fundamental turnaround, moving it from what might have been considered deep value to a higher-priced entity currently at 76% of its 52-week high. Consequently, the AI's algorithm likely interprets this disconnect between valuation run-up and underlying financial performance as a diminishing "AI score," prompting the systematic decrease in weighting to prevent holding a stock whose current market price does not reflect a true fundamental value proposition for AIVL's portfolio.

weight 1.266% → 1.156% (-0.110 pp)·stock down 3.7% in the 30 days before

Jul 13·entry $103.12·now $97.06

AIVL · Weight decrease · 2d

stock up 11.5% in the 30 days before

Jul 2·entry $120.35·now $97.06

PQUS · Weight decrease · 2d

Intel’s negative return on equity of -2.95% and modest revenue growth of 1.36% present a challenge for its continued inclusion and weighting within Pictet Asset Management's PQUS ETF, which targets US large-cap companies. Even with a price-to-earnings ratio of 22.62 and a price-to-book ratio of 1.53, these profitability and growth figures suggest the AI ranking system is evaluating INTC’s fundamental strength for a portfolio focused on measured turnover. The consecutive weight decrease to 0.7300% on July 19th, following the previous day's 0.7400% weighting, coincides with a significant 15.0% decline in INTC's 30-day return, placing its current $95.04 price point at 67% of its 52-week high. This adjustment indicates the fund’s periodic rebalancing mechanism, incorporating sector-balance and concentration rules, is responding to recent price weakness and the company's underlying financial metrics, signaling a reassessment of Intel's position within its ~165 US large-cap holdings.

weight 0.780% → 0.730% (-0.050 pp)·stock down 18.8% in the 30 days before

Jul 19·entry $97.06·now $97.06

PQUS · Weight decrease · 2d

The AI ranking system employed by Pictet Asset Management for PQUS, which governs its portfolio of roughly 165 US large caps, initiated a reduction in INTC’s weight during a recent periodic rebalancing event. The consecutive decreases on July 9th and 10th, from 0.8300% to 0.7400%, reflect a specific de-rating of the stock within the fund's universe. This tactical adjustment likely stems from INTC’s current fundamental profile, particularly its negative ROE of -2.95%, which presents a potential concern for an AI system prioritizing sustainable performance in large-cap selections. Even with INTC’s substantial 1-year return of +400.2%, its recent 30-day return of -7.6% suggests short-term underperformance, prompting the AI to reduce exposure while adhering to sector-balance and concentration rules.

weight 0.830% → 0.740% (-0.090 pp)·stock up 1.8% in the 30 days before

Jul 10·entry $109.84·now $97.06

AIEQ · Weight decrease · 2d

Amplify ETFs’ AIEQ, with its daily rebalancing of 140-180 US stocks, rapidly reflects shifts identified by its IBM Watson NLP engine. This AI-driven approach, constantly ingesting news, filings, and social posts, likely detected a worsening outlook for INTC, prompting the consecutive weight decrease from 0.30% to 0.28% between July 16th and 17th. The fund's system likely weighed recent sentiment against the company's -2.95% ROE and its significant 30-day price drop of -15.0%, even as it remains at 67% of its 52-week high. Such a pattern indicates Watson’s model is signaling caution, prioritizing more recent negative data points over INTC’s prior 1-year return of +332.0%.

weight 0.310% → 0.280% (-0.030 pp)·stock down 18.8% in the 30 days before

Jul 17·entry $95.04·now $97.06

AIEQ · Weight decrease · 2d

stock up 11.5% in the 30 days before

Jul 3·entry $122.20·now $97.06